Author Login
Post Reply
As it is fixed in svn, my +0 is now a +1.
For the record, note that I don't use ivyde, so I also only checked
the "legal" aspects. But I trust the +1 of Nicolas (and Xavier) for
the technical aspects.
2008/6/24 Stefan Bodewig <bodewig@(protected)>:
> On Mon, 23 Jun 2008, Gilles Scokart <gscokart@(protected):
>
>> I run RAT on the source distribution. Some headers are missing for
>> .classpath and .project files. Maybe features.properties should
>> have it also. I don't know for change.txt and manifest.mf
>>
>> The report can be found :
>> http://people.apache.org/~gscokart/ivyde-sources-2_0_0_alpha1.rat
>>
>> I would not say that this is blocking issues, so I'm +0.
>
> I agree that they are non-blocking.
>
> +1 on the alpha release based solely on the legal oversight parts, I
> lack the competence as well as the environment to check for anything
> else.
>
> Stefan
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@(protected)
>
>
--
Gilles Scokart
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@(protected)