Well, this solution is my really last plan for this :-). But thanks, anyway.

Some other proposals?



rigel wrote:
>
> Hello Peter,
>
> I know you probably know ;-)
> that this fast solution which I post now is not so well appreciated due
> to its possible privileges unconvenients, but in the meanwhile
> if I was you I would access private members with a PrivilegedAction:
>
> <xmp>
>   public static Object testAccess(Object instance, String s) {
>    try {
>      final Field f = instance.getClass().getDeclaredField(s);
>      AccessController.doPrivileged(new PrivilegedAction() {
>          public Object run() {
>            f.setAccessible(true);
>            return null;
>          }
>        });
>      Object o = f.get(instance);
>      return o;
>    } catch(Exception e) {
>      e.printStackTrace();
>    }
>    return null;
>   }
> </xmp>
>
> Hoping it would be be useful as temporary patch ;-)
>
> Bye
>
>
> Petar Tahchiev wrote:
>>
>> Sorry for the formating :-(.
>>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> it's Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus Team (again :-)).
>> I am trying to integrate the CactusTask with Ant 1.8-alpha.
>> The CactusTask does:
>> 0) Extends the JUnitTask from Ant.
>> 1) Gets all the tests from JUnitTask
>> 2) Iterates over them and sets different properties to each one of them.
>> 3) Calls the JUnitTask to executes the test-cases.
>>
>> So, the basis is that we are no longer able to use
>>
>> execute(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTest);
>>
>> because the delegate field (Object of type JUnitTaskMirror) leaves
>> uninitialized and thus the CactusTask throws NLPE.
>> This way to execute the tests we are bound to use the execute() method of
>> the
>> JUnitTask (because in that method the delegate object gets initialized).
>> When calling
>> the execute() method we have to have our tests configured. But when I get
>> the tests and configure them with:
>> ===============================================================
>>           Enumeration tests = getIndividualTests();
>>          
>>           while (tests.hasMoreElements())
>>           {
>>              JUnitTest test = (JUnitTest) tests.nextElement();
>>            
>>              if (test.shouldRun(getProject())
>>               && !theWrapper.isExcluded(test.getName()))
>>              {
>>                 test.setFork(true);
>>                 if (theWrapper.getToDir() != null)
>>                 {
>>                   test.setTodir(theWrapper.getToDir());
>>                 }
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> I am no longer able to set them in the JUnitTask. The field tests is
>> private:
>>
>>   private Vector tests = new Vector();
>>
>> and there is no setter for an individual test, or a vector of tests.
>>
>> Please, can you look serious to this and supply a setter method for this.
>> This way I can configure
>> the tests and set them in the JUnitTask, and after that just call
>> execute().
>>
>> Thank you very much.
>>
>> P.S. Please keep me in a CC, because I am not subscribed to the Ant
>> Developers' lists.
>>
>> --
>> Regards, Petar!
>> Karlovo, Bulgaria.
>>
>> EOOXML Objections
>> http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections
>>
>> Public PGP Key at:
>> https://keyserver1.pgp.com/vkd/DownloadKey.event?keyid=0x19658550C3110611
>> Key Fingerprint: A369 A7EE 61BC 93A3 CDFF 55A5 1965 8550 C311 0611
>>
>
>



--
Sent from the Ant - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@(protected)