Hi Steve,

actually I want 2 getter and 2 setter methods. Please review the
applied patch I supply and say if everything is OK.

Thanks, Petar.
http://www.nabble.com/file/p15434717/JUnitTask_getters_setters.patch
JUnitTask_getters_setters.patch

Steve Loughran wrote:
>
> Petar Tahchiev wrote:
>> Sorry for the formating :-(.
>>
>>
>> Hi guys,
>>
>> it's Petar Tahchiev from the Jakarta Cactus Team (again :-)).
>> I am trying to integrate the CactusTask with Ant 1.8-alpha.
>> The CactusTask does:
>> 0) Extends the JUnitTask from Ant.
>> 1) Gets all the tests from JUnitTask
>> 2) Iterates over them and sets different properties to each one of them.
>> 3) Calls the JUnitTask to executes the test-cases.
>>
>> So, the basis is that we are no longer able to use
>>
>> execute(org.apache.tools.ant.taskdefs.optional.junit.JUnitTest);
>>
>> because the delegate field (Object of type JUnitTaskMirror) leaves
>> uninitialized and thus the CactusTask throws NLPE.
>> This way to execute the tests we are bound to use the execute() method of
>> the
>> JUnitTask (because in that method the delegate object gets initialized).
>> When calling
>> the execute() method we have to have our tests configured. But when I get
>> the tests and configure them with:
>> ===============================================================
>>           Enumeration tests = getIndividualTests();
>>          
>>           while (tests.hasMoreElements())
>>           {
>>              JUnitTest test = (JUnitTest) tests.nextElement();
>>            
>>              if (test.shouldRun(getProject())
>>               && !theWrapper.isExcluded(test.getName()))
>>              {
>>                 test.setFork(true);
>>                 if (theWrapper.getToDir() != null)
>>                 {
>>                   test.setTodir(theWrapper.getToDir());
>>                 }
>> ===============================================================
>>
>> I am no longer able to set them in the JUnitTask. The field tests is
>> private:
>>
>>   private Vector tests = new Vector();
>>
>> and there is no setter for an individual test, or a vector of tests.
>>
>> Please, can you look serious to this and supply a setter method for this.
>> This way I can configure
>> the tests and set them in the JUnitTask, and after that just call
>> execute().
>>
>
> So all you want is a setTests(Vector) method? or an addTest(JUnitTest)
> method that adds a new test?
>
>
> --
> Steve Loughran            http://www.1060.org/blogxter/publish/5
> Author: Ant in Action       http://antbook.org/
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@(protected)
>
>
>

--
Sent from the Ant - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@(protected)