| ANT <CVS > Task | ANT <CVS > Task 2005-06-09 - By S I
Great Rob. Thank you very much. Your explanation made it very clear. Thanks
again :)
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Anderson, Rob (Global Trade)" <Rob.Anderson@(protected)>
Reply-To: "Ant Users List" <user@(protected)>
To: "Ant Users List" <user@(protected)>
Subject: RE: ANT <CVS> Task
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:12:46 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from mail.apache.org ([209.237.227.199]) by MC8-F33.hotmail.com
with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 9 Jun 2005 11:13:08 -0700
Received: (qmail 82562 invoked by uid 500); 9 Jun 2005 18:13:02 -0000
Received: (qmail 82548 invoked by uid 99); 9 Jun 2005 18:13:02 -0000
Received: pass (hermes.apache.org: local policy)
Received: from nbarrierb241.nike.com (HELO barrierb241.nike.com)
(146.197.27.40) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.28) with ESMTP; Thu, 09 Jun 2005
11:13:01 -0700
X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jF25zk8fyvbtDHKEG0uTla1f/pJPNdrLVY=
Mailing-List: contact user-help@(protected); run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:user-unsubscribe@(protected)>
List-Help: <mailto:user-help@(protected)>
List-Post: <mailto:user@(protected)>
List-Id: "Ant Users List" <user.ant.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list user@(protected)
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0tests=
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
X-Server-Uuid: BDE2CC8B-9671-48D4-9A25-CA756DA0A621
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: ANT <CVS> Task
Thread-Index: AcVshKha0y6nigXOT4m8lweSDR+eeQAmaneg
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jun 2005 18:12:46.0488 (UTC)
FILETIME=[D67CD980:01C56D1E]
X-WSS-ID: 6EB659142FC263044-01-01
X-Virus-Checked: Checked
Return-Path: user-return-50568-xiamak=hotmail.com@(protected)
Comments below...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: S I [mailto:xiamak@(protected)]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 08, 2005 4:30 PM
> To: user@(protected)
> Subject: Re: ANT <CVS> Task
>
>
> Here's then another question:
>
> Normally, I tag cvs repository as soon as I checkout since I
> do not lock the
> repository during a build. If I tag after a successful
> build, don't I take
> the chance of someone checking in code between the time I
> checked out to
> build's completion? If someone checked in code while I was
> building then
> the integrity of my build is questionable, no?
This is true only if you are doing an rtag. A cvs tag will label what you
currently have checked out in your workspace.
>
> Then again I'm not clear of CVS Tagging architecture, in the
> sense, that
> whether it matches my local working folder's date/time stamp
> to the live
> repository and that is what it tags only or tags the live
> repository at its
> current state? Which is the case? Does it matter when a
> buildmaster tags
> their project?
cvs rtag will tag the repository, cvs tag will tag your workspace. Two
options:
1. cvs rtag, then checkout the tag with cvs co -r tagname
2. cvs co first, then cvs tag
These two possibilities will ensure that what you are building is what is
tagged, and vice-versa.
-Rob A
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
|
|
 |
