| AW: AW: Anyone written an Ant shell yet? | AW: AW: Anyone written an Ant shell yet? 2003-03-13 - By Jan.Materne@(protected)
Yes, that?s what wished in Bug 17659. But its rejected, sorry -
marked as "WONTFIX" = "The problem described is a bug which will never be
fixed.".
So good luck on writing and let us know ;-)
Maybe Leos Literak (Reporter of that bug) will help you.
Jan Mat?rne
-----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: webhiker [mailto:webhiker@(protected)]
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2003 11:46
An: Ant Users List
Betreff: Re: AW: Anyone written an Ant shell yet?
More along the lines of your second option.
But not quite...
During development (die-hard Xemacs) I always iterate around
"ant clean"
"ant compile"
"ant jar"
etc. to call my targets as needed.
In a shell mode, I would just need to type
%ant shell>clean
%ant shell>compile
%ant shell>jar
with the MAIN benefit of :
1)not having to wait 3 days for a Jvm to start each time
2)A homogenous env instead of arsing about with Cygwin, cmd.exe, Unix
shells etc.
3)It could easily extend and embrace cvs commands, Windows/Unix style
directory navigation etc.
WH
Jan.Materne@(protected) wrote:
> I don?t know what you understand here on "shell".
>
> If you want to write a IDE for buildscripts have a look on Eclipse PlugIn
> "Planty"
> before (http://www.gebit.de/download/planty/about.html).
>
> If you want to have a command line interface for calling targets
> ANT> init target1
> ANT> [target1] output
> ANT> -Dprop=value
> ANT> calltarget2
> then let other people know it:
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14159
> http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17659
>
>
> Jan Mat?rne
>
>
> -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: webhiker [mailto:webhiker@(protected)]
> Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 13. M?rz 2003 10:02
> An: Ant Users List
> Betreff: Anyone written an Ant shell yet?
>
> Just wondering if anyone's attempted to write an Ant shell.
> Developing build files using Ant is quite nice, but if we could get a
> shell together, it would provide a cross-platform shell environment as
> well, saving switching between Unix, Cygwin, command etc, plus should
> see much better start-up time for executing Ant tasks, since they would
> be run in the same JVM.
>
> Anyone done this already, or is there a good reason why it's a bad idea?
>
> WH
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
|
|
 |
