| Custom processor for Xslt task? | Custom processor for Xslt task? 2007-01-07 - By Trevor Harmon
On Jan 3, 2007, at 5:16 AM, Dominique Devienne wrote:
> I always used the -lib approach myself,
Yes, that works for me too, but it's exactly what I'm trying to
avoid! After all, having to specify -lib defeats the purpose of the
<factory> override.
> and can't easily test this
> nowdays, sorry. It's quite possible there's a classloader issue that
> prevents the Saxon factory to be loaded properly from a jar specified
> in the <xslt>'s nested <classpath>. Just check the obvious, like the
> spelling of the factory class name, the classpath, etc..., just in
> case. Good luck, --DD
It's definitely not a misspelling. The <factory> override workaround
always results in a ClassNotFoundException.
I've filed a bug on this issue:
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41314
Trevor
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: user-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, e-mail: user-help@(protected)
|
|
 |
